<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Angelina Jolie, Zoe&#8217;s Ark, the UN on Burma and other nettles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://international.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://international.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma</link>
	<description>Adoption information on intercountry adoption process, \&#34;How to\&#34;, worldwide adoption news, adoption advocacy and reform, adoption travel and birth country visits, adoption stories, parenting international kids.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:35:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: JA</title>
		<link>http://international.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma/comment-page-1#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>JA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 19:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationa.www.adoptionblogs.com/2007/11/15/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>Yep, the Angelina Jolie story isn&#039;t even remotely surprising, sadly enough. I really was expecting something like this. I&#039;m only surprised that the article didn&#039;t suggest that Jolie adopted the child as an &quot;accessory&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, the Angelina Jolie story isn&#8217;t even remotely surprising, sadly enough. I really was expecting something like this. I&#8217;m only surprised that the article didn&#8217;t suggest that Jolie adopted the child as an &#8220;accessory&#8221;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chromesthesia</title>
		<link>http://international.adoptionblogs.com/weblogs/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma/comment-page-1#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Chromesthesia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://internationa.www.adoptionblogs.com/2007/11/15/angelina-jolie-zoe-s-ark-the-un-on-burma#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>Huh? Praising changes in BURMA?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think I&#039;ve seen enough BBC to know how WRONG that is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh? Praising changes in BURMA?</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;ve seen enough BBC to know how WRONG that is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
