I am constantly amazed by the way politics moves through the arena of children's issues and needs, and the craft with which spin tweaks dire circumstances toward a shiny, smiley-face projection of the situation.

Case in point,
this report from Pakistan titled, "Government planning model orphanages across country."
Sources said the Social Welfare Ministry was planning to introduce model orphanages in almost all major cities of the country because most of the donor agencies including the United Nation had demanded the government upgrade orphanages to provide better education, food, medication, sports and other facilities to orphans.
Sources said orphans would be given free education till they could earn on their own, they would be provided facilities including dispensaries, playgrounds and schools. They said orphans would also be provided free technical and computer education.
SPONSOR
Right now, of course, this is all in the talking / paperwork phase, with the Pakistani federal government asking that all provincial governments submit their summaries of projects by the end of February.
Okay.
For starters, this report says the Lahore orphanage will be the first tackled and will take ten years.
And if my guess is anywhere close to the mark, it will cost a bazillion dollars, and someone will get rich in the meantime, and officials will be bribed with every inspection, and administrators will line a pocket or two.
Hmmm. And how many children will find safety and comfort and love and real care?
The Kashmir earthquake in October of 2005 killed 73,276 and jolted 3.3 million Pakistanis into homelessness. More than fifty-thousand children were orphaned. Others have been since, or abandoned due to the desperation of parents with no resources for too many kids. For most of these, NOTHING has been done. They freeze again this winter in flimsy tents ... if they are lucky.
None of these children are adoptable, partly because of religious issues, partly because international organizations decided a week after the quake that permanent families outside the area was not a good idea or worried that some would take advantage and traffic kids for unsavory purposes.
I can't help but wonder how many quake victims have gone to slavery and the sex trade, or starvation and death, because adoption was not an option.
Does anyone care?
Would a country capable of establishing a system of truly 'model orphanages' have taken this long to do anything for the most obvious of children in need?
Model orphanages.
Romania had model orphanages. Remember those? Ceausescu had them. Now they're
closing them down because the popular trend in Europe is fewer orphanages and the EU is demanding lower numbers.
This is the UN's idea of caring for children in Pakistan. And it's not even about orphanages ... it's about giving the appearance of being about orphanages, about spin.
As far as I'm concerned, the only 'model orphanage' the world should have is a summer camp of high-impact aerobics and ice tea with lettuce lunches for Kate Mosses and Naomi Campbells, and if the UN wants to fund it, fine. It would be easy to spin that into a story with a pretty face.