International Adoption Blog

09/08/06

Spanning the Divide, Conclusion

Posted by : Sandra Hanks Benoiton in International Adoption Blog at 12:23 am , 699 words, 87 views  
Categories: Understanding the Triad
This is the last post in the series, continued from here ...

Although birth parents and adoptive parents come at adoption from different directions, there can be a few places where paths cross.

Agencies can be where the concerns meet, and both partners in this dance may be unhappy with the tune played by the professionals ... since the end result is supposed to be one partner ending up with an armful of love and the other walking away empty handed, it is in the interest of the piper to keep the steps simple and the dance going as long as possible.

On the one hand, they do no business without children. On the other, someone needs to want the kids. If you're making your living from putting these together, you're darned careful to keep the proportions about even, and have each side thinking you're working for the benefit of both ... but with a little extra care for their angle on the deal.

SPONSOR

Agencies moving between one side and the other can create tension, build walls and foster misunderstandings. Relationships that begin this way may tend to continue as they started.

So, feelings about professionals and their involvement in so personal an endeavor may be one area where the ideas of birth parents and adoptive parents could meet, but rarely do. Even in cases where all parties sit at the same table and have the same conversation, what looks like communication may not be.

It could be a bit like a possible scenario in China:

To over-simpify to an almost criminal extent ... There are hundreds of Chinese dialects, many completely incomprehensible between speakers of one and those with a different version. The script, however, the written language, is the same. Because it's not a phonetic language, because the symbols mean what they are, the word horse, could mean 'horse, and would be written 'horse', put pronounced 'watermelon' in one dialect and 'shoe', in another. A conversation could stick strictly to an agenda, but it would be pretty hard for either side to understand more than the very basic basics of the business at hand, and misinterpretations would be pretty much guaranteed.

Birth mothers worry about coercion. Adoptive parents worry about scams. Birth mothers complain about severed contact. Adoptive parents complain about uninvolved or disappearing birth parents. Trust is hard to come across and suspicion is considered wise.

One side sees a world of sick, starving, homeless children, and picks up on every story of drug-addled pregnant teens, abusive and neglectful moms forgetting to feed the kids they locked in the closet before going out on a date, and women popping out baby after baby without a thought toward responsibility for the welfare of any of them.

The other has frightened, confused women in mind ... women who could and would parent well if given the chance ... and focuses on the losses and grief that are by definition a deeply ingrained and life-long feature of children relinquished by birth parents and the parents that relinquished.

Bottom line?

Jan and I sit on opposite banks of a wide chasm. Raging torrents of reality sometimes make it impossible to hear what's being shouted from one side to the other. With some effort, brought about by a strong desire to see what the world looks like over there, we've built ourselves a fragile bridge.

I can't speak for Jan, but I am now much more comfortable standing on my side, whistling my note of the triad, and knowing I can harmonize without someone telling me to shut up. After all, it's the third note ... the children .. that is what this song is all about, and the sweeter the tune, the better for all.

My hope is that we will continue to shore up this connection and eventually feel comfortable going back and forth without fear, and that others may use our foundations to build their own bridges.

(I would like to announce that I have unilaterally declared September 6,7 & 8 the International Days of Mixed Metaphor. As you will note, I have celebrated the occasion enthusiastically.)

Here are the links to the whole series ...

Part One,Part Two,Part Three,Part Four, Part Five , Part Six, Part Seven

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: merrill1277 [Member] Email
"On the one hand, they do no business without children. On the other, someone needs to want the kids."

It's not always as simple as the expectant mother "not wanting" the child. As happened in massive proportions in the past, it can still happen that it's her parents, or pastor, or others of power or influence in her life who won't accept the child. Pre-birth matches and arrangements are premature. There is a transformation that takes placed through and after the birth and these people, or the mother herself if she had doubts, can dramatically change. It is also about how the expectant mother feels about herself. She may not feel that her circumstances are worthy of bringing the child into them and not be aware of resources to improve them, not necessarily that she "doesn't want" to. No matter, it always seems to be translated in adoption to being an "unwanted" child situation. I just cringe when I hear about adoption being all about "unwanted" babies, because it was not so in my case and so many others. Granted there are cases. And adoption is good in those cases. But always implying that is, a hurtful generalization. My son grew up believing he was "unwanted". It was a lie. You have no idea how much this hurt him and was not to his "benefit". I think agencies should be "darned careful" to check into situations with gray areas and make sure this baby is not in the true sense of the word unwanted. It's the gray areas I'm talking about. I'm not talking about the starving children in other countries, or the DSS cases here.
PermalinkPermalink 09/08/06 @ 08:19
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
Okay, so I should have said, someone needs to want to adopt the kids. I was not making any statement about birth parents, but about the dynamics in the business of adoptions as dealt with by agencies.
This entire series has been about trying to build a bridge between a birth mom and an adoptive mom.
Anyone have a question about why this can be hard?
Sheesh.
PermalinkPermalink 09/08/06 @ 11:17
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to International Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 106