International Adoption Blog

02/22/06

Freedom, Rightness and Life

Posted by : Sandra Hanks Benoiton in International Adoption Blog at 01:27 am , 371 words, 109 views  
Categories: It's a big, wide world
International adoptions draw attention ... good, bad, rarely indifferent. Who hasn’t heard about Angelina Jolie’s kids? And while there are many who applaud her decision to bring her family together from far-flung corners of the world, others line up to criticize choice of country, second guess process and question motives. Publications specializing in slimy sensationalism regurgitate conjecture and innuendo and sell a lot of papers in the process.

Slamming the idea of adopting from struggling and/or developing nations is very popular these days. Some international organizations, many agencies of the United Nations included, take a "last resort" stance when it comes to children leaving tragically poor countries for families elsewhere. Internet groups discuss ad nauseam pros and cons of a "Western" (although this term alone can generate hot responses and scalding posts) upbringing opposed to a life steeped in the culture of the birth country, however short that life might be.

SPONSOR
Click here to visit Adoption Associates

I don’t get it.

No one in my family lives anywhere near the town of their birth, some, not in the same state. And then there’s me, twelve time zones …that’s half the world … away from where I began.

My household, living in Seychelles, consists of my husband, Mark, born in England, California-born me, and Sam and Cj with their Cambodian roots. My best friend here started out in Canada, another in India. Our closest neighbor was born in Uganda, and just down the hill we have a husband and wife team that came from Germany and Czech Republic, respectively.

I’m in contact with an American family living in Mongolia and considering adoption from Liberia, a South African in Israel looking at the Ethiopia program and a Swede in Brazil about ready to travel to Vietnam.

Being in a position of power and deciding that the circumstances of a person’s birth dictate the range of that life is contrary to everything I believe about freedom. Imposing a life sentence where there has been no crime but the act of being born is contrary to everything I believe about rightness. Thinking that everyone should grow up in their own neighborhood and live there until they die is contrary to everything I know about life.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Lisa [Visitor]
Hi Sandra,
Yes, the naysayers are out and about, and often, not minutes after they finish congratulating me on the choice to adopt, go into a passive-aggressive discussion on illegal adoptions, selling babies, and why intercountry adoption when there are so many children for adoption in the U.S.? I need to work on my patience constantly to deal with these people.
OK, now my problem with Angelina. I have little respect for the lifestyle she lead before she adopted, and each year since she has entered the movie star spotlight, she has had a different "persona" or was following a new fad (ie. gothic, etc). Now, she dresses like Mother Theresa and is in her "mothering" persona. What happens to the kids when she gets bored with this fad of hers? One thing is certain: with her being so high profile, the s... will hit the fan in the adoption world. Sorry, but she worries me, and I'm sorry my adoption doctor is involved with her (Dr. J. Aronson), but happy that she has taken care of the children.
OH, yes, and about living "close to home," I am now living in country #3 in my life, and ready for a 4th!
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/06 @ 07:52
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
Let's give Angelina a break, shall we? What we see is not necessarily what is, as her "people" have a lot to do with what can look like shifting personas. Part of the business of movies is to look like the latest, but this doesn't mean it's real life for the people involved. My guess is that she's a loving mom who works hard and does the best she can, just like the rest of us.
So...which countries?
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/06 @ 10:26
Comment from: Lisa [Visitor]
Sorry Sandra, I haven't, for example, gotten over the French kiss Angelina gave her brother on TV in front of all of us idiots who were watching whatever stupid awards show it was. And also, actors are as visible as they want to be. For example, did you know that Meg Ryan adopted a little girl from China? OK, on to something else.
So which countries...Canada (17 years),Israel (18 years), & the U.S (17 years); and each VERY different from each other, believe it or not.
PermalinkPermalink 02/22/06 @ 15:10
Comment from: Older Parent Adoption Blog Archive [Member] Email · http://older-parent.adoptionblogs.com
Sandra, I heartily concur with you!

As far as Angelina goes, her children seem very well cared for and we have no reason to suspect she may "ditch them when this fad is over"

Just because she kissed her brother years ago doesn't mean she isn't a good mother.
PermalinkPermalink 02/23/06 @ 00:08
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to International Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 107