International Adoption Blog

04/13/07

NY Post's Adoption Agenda

Posted by : Sandra Hanks Benoiton in International Adoption Blog at 04:52 am , 501 words, 119 views  
Categories: Celebrity Adoptions
After taking more than a little bit of my time to compose a response to a request for comment on Angelina Jolie's adoptions from a reporter from the New York Post, I was irked, but not surprised, to see what ended up in print.


My comments came from both heart and head, were reasonable, fair and balanced. Not, apparently, what they were going for at the Post.The story, when it appeared, proved the paper had an obvious agenda in mind long before anyone asked what I thought. They must have been trawling in hopes of dredging up gunk and, of course, they managed to find someone thrilled to their boot tips to give them what they wanted.

Throwing in rumors of Angelina criticizing Madonna and trying to tie a comment she made regarding illegal adoptions to hinted sleaze tossed at her Cambodian adoption, the article decided to pick quotes that don't favor Ms. Jolie, like, "Angelina is not a hero in the adoption community," and, " ... said that after Jolie's adoption scandal, Cambodia closed its doors, and many families who were waiting to acquire children were left empty-handed."

SPONSOR

As if she was responsible for the suspension!

This is an up-close and personal experience to illustrate how the media controls and manipulates a story. It's not pretty, and it's certainly not fair, but it is what it is.

What happens because of the way this works can be devastating. The fallout from adoption trashing often ends up with children trapped behind a mirror of distortion for their entire lives.

More than five years ago, the suspension on US adoptions in Cambodia was imposed. Only this week, the last US agencies doing adoptions in Russia lost their licenses, and heaven only knows how long it will be until kids there will be allowed to finds homes with American families.

Every parent of a child adopted internationally has a duty to understand the difference between hype and truth, to cling to that truth and distribute it so that it thrives rather than gets buried beneath the piles of trash.

When you see a story about adoption that has a negative cast, ask yourself where it comes from, what's the motivation for it, and where in it is actual fact and truth. Separate out the rumor and innuendo. Throw out the glitz. Get rid of any envy or uninformed judgement. Then, and only then, look carefully at what might be left.

Take what is left and form an opinion. If the residue is something that requires action, take it. If you see reforms are needed, work for them. If laws need changing, get involved in changing them. If you can grab the attention of the media, avoid the bandwagon and put forth thoughtful, well-considered information founded in truth, not knee-jerk reaction to misinformation.

No one exists in a vacuum, and especially not the media. What appears in your local shopping news could be around the world tomorrow, and even if it isn't someone is listening.

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Stefanie [Member] Email
The media is maddening! If I happened to be a journalist and you were kind enough to write be a substantial response, or in fact respond to me at all, I would feel morally obliged to at least refrain from misquoting or manipulating the information you gave me! The press shouldn't be allowed that much "freedom". And by the way, I really liked your actual response
PermalinkPermalink 04/13/07 @ 14:54
Comment from: Sandra Hanks Benoiton [Member] Email · http://international.adoptionblogs.com/
Thank you, Stefanie,

I don't see the problem with the media being a matter of too much freedom. I think it's an issue of too much money. Advertisers are not proper filters.

Also at fault, though, are the consumers of news. If people demanded journalistic integrity and refrained from buying trash, there would be more integrity and far less trash.

Unfortunately, in the bigger numbers people WANT trash, and their constant consumption of it is lowering the level of discourse...even the ability to conduct intelligent discourse.

Every issue of a 'newspaper' that touts "Oprah's Diet Secrets" or "The Secret Sleazy Truth Behind the Jolie-Pitts" that sells ... therefore making money for the people who put the rag together ... encourages more of the same, and less of the alternative: integrity.

Also, the longer this goes on the less likely readers are to know the difference between news and trash, the more brazen the trash manufacturers grow, and the more illusive the truth. Eventually, the society moves closer and closer to becoming a mass of non-thinkers who have come to depend on predigested pap for their daily diet and learned to resist anything challenging that might require an effort to understand.

I don't know about others, but I find that terrifying.


PermalinkPermalink 04/13/07 @ 22:43
Comment from: Stefanie [Member] Email
I agree completely! P.S: I didn't mean freedom in terms of literal "freedom of the media" to report on particular events, etc., - just that certain standards and integrity should be maintained, and the media, whether its motives are political, financial or whatever, should not have the option of evading such standards.
PermalinkPermalink 04/14/07 @ 14:05
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

   

Misc

Subscribe to International Adoption Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • sam1900
  • Guest Users: 177